Recent case law | Equal treatment and company collective agreements
Published on :
25/04/2019
25
April
Apr
04
2019
On April 3, 2019 the French Supreme court (Cour de cassation) put a halt on its case law regarding the presumption of justification that applies to differences in treatment that were outlined by a collective agreement.
The ruling is explicit: there will be no general presumption that the differences are justified.
However, the presumptions do not necessarily disappear for the uses and applications that were already in place. Indeed, the presumption remains in place when European Union law is not involved. Let’s take a closer look.
According to the principle that was set out in 2015, differences in treatment that were outlined in a collective agreement, such as differences between categories of workers, benefited from a solid presumption of justification. This meant that to challenge it, an employee had to prove that the difference in treatment that victimized him was actually completely foreign to any professional considerations.
Since 2015, this presumption was extended to other situations, such as differences between employees working in different sites. This progressive extension has been halted by the ruling of April 3, 2019.
The court’s reasoning is based on European Union law, in particular its provisions regarding procedural rules of evidence of discrimination: these were found to be incompatible with the presumptions resulting from the collective agreements.
Consequently, the presumptions still operate when European Union law does not apply to the question at hand. However, what this covers precisely is a little less clear.
This ruling and its accompanying note, published by the court, raise some uncertainties and ambiguities that will have to be clarified in the near future.
However, this ruling is clearly very important: it means that even when agreed in the context of a company collective bargaining agreement, any difference of treatment shall be carefully considered and motivated.
History
-
Recent case law | Delivering a copy of the mutually agreed termination to the employee
Published on : 06/11/2019 06 November Nov 11 2019Newsletter / Recent Case LawAt the time of the signature of the agreement of a mutually agreed terminati...
-
The saga of the Macron dismissal indemnification scale continues : a court of appeal admits that it is possible to rule out the application of the scale when an application of the ceiling would result in a disproportionate infringement of the employee’s r
Published on : 17/10/2019 17 October Oct 10 2019Newsletter / Recent Case LawOne of the Macron Orders of September 2017 established a compensation scale i...
-
Any employee exposed to a harmful or toxic substance may, under certain conditions, seek compensation from his employer, due to the obligation to ensure the safety of employees
Published on : 16/10/2019 16 October Oct 10 2019NewsNewsletter / Recent Case LawUnder French law, the “anxiety damage” helps to indemnify the situation of pe...
-
Recent case law | Challenges to the Mandatory Indemnity Scale for Unfair Dismissals
Published on : 29/07/2019 29 July Jul 07 2019NewsNewsletter / Recent Case LawOne of the Macron ordinances of September 2017 set up a compensation scheme i...
-
Recent case law | Equal treatment and company collective agreements
Published on : 25/04/2019 25 April Apr 04 2019NewsNewsletter / Recent Case LawOn April 3, 2019 the French Supreme court (Cour de cassation) put a halt on i...
-
Recent case law | Use of Geolocation tools to monitor working time
Published on : 25/04/2019 25 April Apr 04 2019NewsNewsletter / Recent Case LawIt happens quite often that companies put in place a geolocation system to mo...
-
Recent case law | Dismissal during the suspension of the contract due to work-related accident
Published on : 25/04/2019 25 April Apr 04 2019NewsNewsletter / Recent Case LawAccording to the labor code, during the time of the absence due to an industr...
-
When a settlement agreement is drafted in general terms, its scope is not limited to the sole original point of contention. The employee may not claim at a later stage for indemnification of potential rights.
Published on : 18/03/2019 18 March Mar 03 2019NewsNewsletter / Recent Case LawSometimes, upon the termination of the contract, the employer and the employe...
-
Recent Case Law | Macron dismissal indemnity grid is not valid, according to certain French labour courts
Published on : 21/01/2019 21 January Jan 01 2019NewsNewsletter / Recent Case LawA few French courts have considered that the Marcon dismissal indemnity grid...
-
Recent case law | Delivery messengers, couriers…employees? The Supreme Court says yes !
Published on : 09/01/2019 09 January Jan 01 2019NewsNewsletter / Recent Case LawThe French Supreme Court recently handed down a very important decision for t...