Prohibiting alcohol | Post-termination non-competition clause
Published on :
01/04/2022
01
April
Apr
04
2022
1) Prohibiting alcohol
Internal regulations (so called “réglement intérieur”), which are compulsory in companies with at least 50 employees, must lay down health and safety rules. A number of restrictions may be set, subject to the labor administration’s control who shall check whether these are legitimate and proportionate to the sought aim.
Because the French Labor Code expressly allows certain “light” alcoholic beverages to be brought, case law has rejected general prohibition of all types of alcoholic beverage within the premises.
In a decision dated 14th March 2022, the Supreme Administrative Court (Conseil d'Etat) admitted the validity of a generic alcohol prohibition within an industrial site, due to the nature of the business. It rejected the labor administration’s argumentation following which the employer had not characterized the existence of a particular situation of danger due to the lack of figures on the number of work accidents or prior disciplinary issues in relation to alcohol consumption on this site.
This is clearly an important nuance to current case law. However, such a ban may still not be based on general considerations but should be limited to activities: those for which it is obvious that alcohol consumption and employees eventually being drunk would not allow the employer to comply with its duty to protect the employee’s health, which may trigger its civil and criminal liability.
2) Deadline for lifting a post- termination non-competition clause
The terms and conditions for waiving a post termination non-competition clause are laid down in the employment contract or in the sectorial collective bargaining agreement, if any. These provisions usually provide for a period of time following notification of the termination, allowing the employer to unilaterally waive the clause. Not waiving on time means that the non- competition undertaking applies, and the employee shall then receive the associated monthly compensation for the whole duration of the clause.
The question is when to waive the clause when the termination of the contract occurs by mean of a mutually agreed termination (rupture conventionnelle).
In a decision dated 26th January 2022, the Supreme Judicial Court (Cour de cassation), now sets an absolute limit: if the employer intends to lift the non-competition clause, he must do so no later than the date of termination set by the termination agreement (which would generally be the day after the labor administration’s approval of such termination). This limit prevails on any longer timeframe stipulated in the employment contract or the sectorial collective bargaining agreement. This is an important rule to keep in mind, as labour contracts often included a two-weeks period after termination.
History
-
Dismissal of an employee's refusal to adhere to the "fun and pro" culture of his employer ruled null and void | Transfer of professional emails to personal email | Employees’ travel time can be effective working time
Published on : 10/01/2023 10 January Jan 01 2023Newsletter / Recent Case LawDismissal of an employee refusing to adhere to the "fun and pro" culture of h...
-
Employee's setting of residence far away from workplace
Published on : 04/10/2022 04 October Oct 10 2022Newsletter / Recent Case LawFrench law provides for a legal duty to reimburse 50% of the employee’s subsc...
-
Drivers platforms: still complex!
Published on : 04/07/2022 04 July Jul 07 2022Newsletter / Recent Case LawTwo recent court decisions, one criminal, the other civil, discussed subordin...
-
Prohibiting alcohol | Post-termination non-competition clause
Published on : 01/04/2022 01 April Apr 04 2022Newsletter / Recent Case Law1) Prohibiting alcohol Internal regulations (so called “réglement intérie...
-
A settlement agreement following an employee’s report of sexual harassment is invalid / Paid leave: who bears the burden of proof?
Published on : 31/12/2021 31 December Dec 12 2021Newsletter / Recent Case LawA settlement agreement following an employee’s report of sexual harassment is...
-
Employers must react when alerted to threats to employee’s safety. Failure constitutes an inexcusable fault
Published on : 30/09/2021 30 September Sep 09 2021Newsletter / Recent Case LawIn case of an accident at work (or an occupational disease), the employer com...
-
In brief: The Islamic Veil cannot be banned without a neutrality clause, even for commercial reasons
Published on : 01/07/2021 01 July Jul 07 2021NewsNewsletter / Recent Case LawIn 2017, the French Supreme court recognized the possibility, expressed in ar...
-
False accusations of discrimination justify a disciplinary dismissal
Published on : 02/04/2021 02 April Apr 04 2021NewsNewsletter / Recent Case LawAn employee who denounces or reports acts of discrimination benefits from dis...
-
Does a new Supreme Court decision allow partially illicit evidence to be submitted?
Published on : 19/01/2021 19 January Jan 01 2021NewsNewsletter / Recent Case LawA recent decision of the French Supreme Court of 25 November 2020 creates a s...
-
This month recent case laws
Published on : 02/10/2020 02 October Oct 10 2020NewsNewsletter / Recent Case LawTransfers of undertakings to more than one business A recent surprising dec...