Unfair dismissal for racist or xenophobic remarks / Unfair dismissal for rejecting company culture / Being reachable on work trips may not count as work time
Published on :
29/04/2024
29
April
Apr
04
2024
Unfair dismissal for racist or xenophobic remarks
An employee was dismissed for serious misconduct for having sent an email from her professional email account to work colleagues containing racist and xenophobic comments.On March 6th, 2024, the French Supreme Court ruled that the employer had not expressly indicated in the dismissal letter that this behaviour had had an impact on the employee’s relationship with colleagues or business partners nor that it had impacted the company’s reputation. The Court ruled that there was no evidence that these comments had been disclosed beyond the small private circle of work colleagues.
The fact that the employee had used her professional email account was not deemed pertinent as limited personal use was tolerated.
Unfair dismissal for rejecting company culture
An employee objected to his company organizing end-of-week gatherings that frequently led to employees being inebriated and indulging in certain “off-colour” behaviour.On November, 9th, 2022, the French Supreme Court ruled that the employee’s objections and refusal to conform to the company culture was within his right to freedom of expression as provided in the French Labour Code and the European Convention on the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. On this basis, the Paris Court of Appeal then ruled on January 30th, 2024 that the employee had to be reinstated and the company also had to pay him nearly 500,000€ as backpay.
Being reachable on work trips may not count as work time
On March 13th, 2024, the French Supreme Court ruled that the fact that an employee was required to be reachable during a professional trip did not necessarily mean that the entire time spent by the employee on this trip could be qualified as working time and therefore giving rise to overtime.However, the ruling may have been different if the employee had been called several times during such trip.
History
-
China: Non-compete Agreement Cannot Impede the Autonomous Employment Rights of Employees without Confidentiality Obligations
Published on : 24/05/2024 24 May May 05 2024L&E GlobalThe post China: Non-compete Agreement Cannot Impede the Autonomous Employment...Source : leglobal.law
-
China: Beijing High People’s Court and Beijing Labour and Personnel Dispute Arbitration Commission Issued Answers to Labour Dispute Cases (Part 1)
Published on : 24/05/2024 24 May May 05 2024L&E GlobalThe post China: Beijing High People’s Court and Beijing Labour and Personnel...Source : leglobal.law
-
USA: California Supreme Court Issues Opinion on “Hours Worked”
Published on : 22/04/2024 22 April Apr 04 2024L&E GlobalThe post USA: California Supreme Court Issues Opinion on “Hours Worked” appea...Source : leglobal.law
-
USA: Top Five Labor Law Developments for March 2024
Published on : 22/04/2024 22 April Apr 04 2024L&E GlobalThe post USA: Top Five Labor Law Developments for March 2024 appeared first o...Source : leglobal.law
-
USA: Pregnant Workers Fairness Act Final Regulations Released
Published on : 22/04/2024 22 April Apr 04 2024L&E GlobalThe post USA: Pregnant Workers Fairness Act Final Regulations Released appear...Source : leglobal.law
-
Poland: Draft Law on Whistleblowers Has Been Submitted to the Polish Parliament
Published on : 19/04/2024 19 April Apr 04 2024L&E GlobalThe post Poland: Draft Law on Whistleblowers Has Been Submitted to the Polish...Source : leglobal.law